Building Resilience
In the field of performance physical therapy, we often encounter athletes and active individuals who are strong, flexible, and fit—but still find themselves dealing with injuries or plateaus. While traditional training and rehabilitation methods often focus on isolated metrics—range of motion, tissue healing, or brute strength—true injury resilience and recovery require a more integrated approach.
Three pillars—functional strength, core stability, and neuromuscular control—form the foundation of both injury prevention and post-injury recovery. These systems don’t operate independently. They interact constantly, informing how we move, stabilize, and react to stress. When one of these areas is underdeveloped or overlooked, the system as a whole becomes vulnerable.
Let’s break down how each component contributes to resilience—and what the current research says about applying them in both prevention and rehab settings.
1. Functional Strength: More Than Muscle Mass
Strength training is often the first thing athletes think of when it comes to injury prevention—and for good reason. Stronger muscles help absorb force, stabilize joints, and reduce mechanical stress on ligaments and tendons. However, the type of strength training matters.
Functional, multi-joint movements that mimic real-life tasks or sport-specific actions are far more protective than isolated muscle exercises. For example:
Split squats and single-leg variations develop balance, pelvic control, and hip stability—key factors in reducing injury risk to the knees and ankles. A 2022 study published in the Journal of Sports Science and Medicine found a direct correlation between unilateral strength and reduced ACL injury risk in collegiate athletes (Johnston et al., 2022).
Trap bar deadlifts provide a safe and effective way to load the posterior chain while minimizing shear stress on the spine. When performed with proper form, they train hip hinge mechanics, core engagement, and full-body bracing.
Loaded carries (e.g., farmer’s walks, suitcase carries) challenge trunk stability, grip strength, and posture under load—often more dynamically than traditional core exercises.
What separates these movements from basic resistance training is their demand for integration: the nervous system must coordinate multiple joints and muscles simultaneously, reinforcing movement efficiency and adaptability under stress.
2. Core Stability: The Transfer Point for Force and Control
Core strength is frequently misunderstood. It’s not about six-pack abs or holding a plank for five minutes—it's about how well the muscles of the trunk stabilize the spine and transfer force between the upper and lower body.
The deep core system, which includes the diaphragm, transverse abdominis, multifidus, and pelvic floor, functions less as a power generator and more as a stabilizing hub. It maintains intra-abdominal pressure, protects the spine, and allows efficient limb movement. According to research in the Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, proper core activation via diaphragmatic breathing significantly improves lumbopelvic stability and reduces compensatory patterns (Kolar et al., 2012).
Anti-rotation and anti-extension core exercises—such as dead bugs, bird dogs, Pallof presses, and side planks—train the body to resist unnecessary movement and control torque. This “stability under motion” is more reflective of the demands placed on the body during running, lifting, or sport.
Additionally, dynamic core drills that involve movement (e.g., rotational lunges, kettlebell swings, Turkish get-ups) reinforce how the core must respond to changes in direction and load, especially during athletic performance.
Injury risk increases when this system is underdeveloped. Weakness or delayed activation in the deep core can lead to spinal instability, poor posture, and overuse of compensatory muscles like the hip flexors or low back extensors. Long-term, this imbalance contributes to chronic pain and recurring strain injuries.
3. Neuromuscular Control: The Brain-Body Connection in Injury Recovery
Even after structural healing has occurred post-injury, many individuals continue to feel unstable, uncoordinated, or hesitant during movement. This is often due to disrupted neuromuscular control—a breakdown in the communication between the central nervous system and the musculoskeletal system.
Neuromuscular rehabilitation focuses on restoring this connection through exercises that improve joint awareness, reflexive stabilization, and automatic movement correction.
One of the most fundamental concepts is proprioception—the body’s ability to sense its position in space. After injuries such as ankle sprains, ACL tears, or shoulder dislocations, proprioceptors become impaired, which diminishes joint stability. A 2020 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Sport Rehabilitation confirmed that proprioceptive training significantly reduces the risk of re-injury by restoring joint position sense and balance (Hupperets et al., 2020).
Effective neuromuscular training includes:
Balance and perturbation drills that challenge the athlete to maintain joint alignment in the presence of internal or external disruption.
Reactive stability exercises, such as catching a ball while balancing or resisting partner-applied forces, which retrain automatic muscular responses.
Cognitive dual-tasking (e.g., combining movement with mental challenges) to simulate sport-specific demands and build robust motor programs.
Rebuilding neuromuscular control is especially important in the late stages of rehabilitation, where athletes must re-learn how to trust their body and perform with confidence. Without this component, athletes may return to sport with unresolved movement dysfunctions, increasing their risk for compensatory injuries.
Learn about how Jake healed his knee forever post-knee surgery!
Integrating the Three Pillars: A Holistic Approach to Performance and Resilience
While each of these systems—strength, core stability, and neuromuscular control—can be trained independently, their true value lies in integration. An effective injury prevention or recovery program doesn’t isolate these systems. It layers them, progressing from isolated control to dynamic application under real-world conditions.
For example, a return-to-play protocol might begin with:
Controlled strength work to build foundational capacity
Static core stability to reduce excessive motion
Basic balance exercises to restore proprioception
From there, the program should evolve toward:
Dynamic strength under fatigue or speed
Core activation during loaded and rotational movement
Reactive and sport-specific neuromuscular drills
This progressive integration ensures that the athlete not only recovers structurally, but regains confidence, coordination, and true movement efficiency.
Conclusion
Injury prevention and rehabilitation aren’t about checking boxes—they’re about restoring the body’s ability to move well under stress. By combining functional strength training, targeted core stability, and focused neuromuscular re-education, we create athletes and individuals who aren’t just healed—they’re resilient.
Whether you’re returning from an injury or looking to stay ahead of one, your program should build from the inside out—starting with how your body stabilizes, reacts, and connects movement to intention.
If you're unsure whether your current plan is addressing these pillars effectively, a movement screen or performance assessment with a physical therapist trained in integrated rehab may provide critical insight.
References
Johnston, L. et al. (2022). Unilateral Strength and ACL Injury Risk in Athletes. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.
Kolar, P. et al. (2012). Diaphragmatic Function and Core Stability in Athletes. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy.
Hupperets, M. et al. (2020). Proprioceptive Training for Injury Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation.
